huntington beach banner
File #: 23-462    Version: 2
Type: Consent Calendar Status: Passed
File created: 5/22/2023 In control: City Council/Public Financing Authority
On agenda: 6/6/2023 Final action: 6/6/2023
Title: Annual Military Equipment Use Report (AB 481)
Attachments: 1. Att #1 - HBPD Annual Mililtary Equipment Use Report (AB 481), including Exhibits 1-5, 2. Att #2 - Policy 300, 3. 6.6 SC - Email
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

SUBMITTED BY: Al Zelinka, City Manager

VIA: Eric Parra, Chief of Police

PREPARED BY: Capt. Gaute Svendsbo

Subject:
title
Annual Military Equipment Use Report (AB 481)
body

Statement of Issue:
California Government Code Chapter 12.8, "Funding, Acquisition, and Use of Military Equipment" in part requires that the City annually review the ordinance (Ordinance 4255 - Exhibit 3) that approved the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular City Council meeting.

In addition, the City is required to determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted as part of this annual process, whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval detailed in the Analysis section below.

Financial Impact:
The estimated ongoing annual maintenance and equipment replacement costs total is $61,050. Sufficient funds are budgeted each year for the Police Department out of the General Fund to cover these costs.

Recommended Action:
recommendation
A) Find that each type of military equipment identified in that report attached hereto as Attachment 1 complies with the following standards for approval: 1. The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. 2. The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. 3. Any future purchased equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. 4. Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action...

Click here for full text