History Details

File #: 25621   
Type: Public Hearing
Title: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 25-003 (REAPPLICATION PROCESS FOR GROUP HOMES) REQUEST: To amend Section 230.28 (Group Homes) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to prohibit a group home from reapplying for permits for five years from the date of the denial or revocation of a permit. LOCATION: Citywide
Mover: Benjamin Goldberg Seconder: Ann Palmer
Result: Pass
Agenda note:
Minutes note:

DMG- bush, goldberg

TP- staff

BB- mcgee, goldberg

BT- burns, kennedy, twining, staff

KB- none

AP- none

BG- mcgee, bush

 

Jason Kelley, Senior Planner, gave the staff presentation for the proposed project.

 

DMG-can anyone apply for a group home license? like a private family.

JK- If they are operating a facility (sober living, residential) yes

 

TP- pleased that council brought this amendment forward. confirm that a group home must be 1000 ft from one another. can we include schools in the 1000 ft radius? concerned with sex offenders. how are people evaluated for living there.

JK- we solely require permit. they have regulations they have to abide by.

TP- what if there was an issue

JK- reviewed enforcement process

TP- does state get involved?

JB- it depends on the type of facility and the licensing. we would have to assess muni code to see if there are violations.

TP- spoke at length re prior incident at a sober living house.

 

BB- who enforces nuisance activity for the city?

JB- police, code, and what type of violation it is.

BB- so there is a structure in place

JB- correct

 

AP- think there are some issues with group homes. believe cc and law enforcement are making an effort to improve the situation.

 

BG- agree with commissioners. spoke about impacts. not wanting near schools. don't think we;re in a position to amend to exclude 1000 ft schools.

 

RR- we only follow council's direction. see memo attached. published legal advertisement. so if interested then recommend a minute action to buffer schools.

 

DMG- do neighbors have recourse before a license is approved.

 

BT- provisions on evictions, reappliactions, etc.

 

RR- no notification for the sober living home permit. but cups require permit.

 

kb- no language currently re: proximity to schools?

JK- correct. only buffer between uses.

 

TP- occupants get returned to their original place of residence. does that mean like new jersey?

JK- not sure how that's handled.

 

TP- don't know if we have standards of efficacy.

 

RR- return based on driver's license.

TP- we don't have to pay

RR- correct. please remember that this is existing language and not what we are here tonight

 

OPEN

 

no one

 

CLOSED

 

 

Action: adopted
Action text: Motion by Goldberg, seconded by Palmer, to That the Planning Commission take the following actions: A) Find the project exempt from additional environmental review pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 4501, Class 20, which supplements the California Environmental Quality Act because the request is a minor amendment to the zoning ordinance that does not change the development standards intensity or density. B) Recommend approval of Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 25-003 to the City Council with suggested findings (Attachment No. 1).. The motion carried by the following vote: